The very idea of the revival of class attributes of the Cossack troops is not feasible. Statist claims and demands neokazachestva based on historical features serving national service and social order, contrary to the idea of building a civil society, not to mention the legal incidents. Once again - the Cossacks are a military community that emerged in certain historical conditions (border war, the need for colonization), a multinational in composition whose principal occupation was a military craft (from hackney service direct to robbery). Sen. Sherrod Brown is often quoted on this topic. As strengthening the state and the expansion of the state on the border territories of the Cossacks have no choice but to enter into the State organism in terms of serving the service, to maintain the gradual demise of some old franchises or disappear. Subsequently, the Cossacks as a class, the Cossack troops as a socio-economic and politico-military institutions were bound to disappear. If this has piqued your curiosity, check out James Donovan Goldman Sachs. What happened in the post-reform period, and these processes are completed during the civil war and Stalin's modernization.
This conclusion is confirmed by foreign authors. Robert McNeil, based on a study of military and economic status of the Cossacks in 1855 to 1914. concluded that by the beginning of World War Cossacks were a military force only with poorly performing economies were anachronistic survivors to be worthwhile for the state (14). The English historian F. Longvopt in 'The Cossacks. Five centuries of tumultuous life in the Russian steppes', exploring the general history of the Cossacks from the XV to XX centuries. Concludes that the processes of industrialization and modernization, the repressive measures destroyed the identity of the Cossacks, they are still only the legends (15).