As Weber to apartir of the moment where the voter delegates authority for the vote to the politician, who represents hypothetically it, ' ' entrega' ' its citizenship in the elitoral and partisan market. Legitimizing to be able To to deal with the legitimacy of the power, Weber, in its Sociology Politics, distinguishes three types of legitimate domination: the traditional one, charismatic and the legal rational. It must be registered that Weber, when deals with the types of domination, leaves clearly that they are about type-ideals, and, therefore, that never they meet, or only very rare, in pure state in the historical reality. According to Weber, for the scientific research, the type-ideal concept intends to instruct the decision: it is not hypothesis, however it wants to indicate the direction of the hypothetical formation. It is not representation of the Real, however it wants to provide, clearly, a way of expression of the representation. Amongst the forms of legitimation of the power, the traditional domain has for base the belief in the sanctity of the traditions in vigor and the legitimacy that they are called to the power in virtue of the custom. The authority does not belong to a superior chosen for the inhabitants of the country, but yes to a man who is called to the power in virtue a custom (primogeniture, for example). Born in the kingdom it the personal heading, of luck that the obedience if dirige to its person and if becomes a mercy act.
The governed ones are subjects whom they do not obey an impersonal norm, but legitimated orders in virtue of the traditional privilege of the sovereign. According to mood of this, can be gotten its favors or be fallen in disaster. However, the tradition is not assimilable to the pure will, therefore if the sovereign the viola, risks to provoke it a resistance that, certainly, it does not aim at to the system, but yes its person or its favourites person or thing.