I myself support the creation of new public utilities because the profits could help the city, and this ecological and climate-friendly energy systems away can be a step in the direction of nuclear power. So without a substantive debate only on the issue it was discussed whether an urgent decision. The CDU mayor had on the grounds of an emergency decision the hundred thousand job long before assigned to approve this decision by the Chairmen of the SPD and sign show said law firm. "" He the urgency the Amigo round established himself with the schedule on the "Steering Committee" had, to the exclusion of citizens and, without a public debate in the City Council, even agreed. This schedule is not much transparency and the question remains why one not previously could have made it. Di is question the establishment of public utilities for the first time in the summer 2010 in connection with a proposal from the left. and the BfBB surfaced and was later again by the SPD picked up. It was already the concession contracts and new public utilities for the production of renewable energy in the eye.
Mayor and administration had inexplicably delayed the discussion. Now suddenly everything had to go very quickly. This was the instrument of an urgent decision"out of a hat, to eliminate as the democratically elected committees or the City Council, and to go to the public procurement law and the Award Committee. The bodies that are provided according to the municipal code and of the Constitution of the State of NRW for these decisions had led still no fundamental discussion about which direction is, without having to decide definitively. These were the alleged emergency decision"undermined. The already granted request could be approved only later in the City Council.
Even if the City Council approval with a majority of CDU, FDP and SPD was issued lifting the order would have been impossible. An urgency never existed, why Yes, the year 2010 in detail would have can be used. The schedule would also be quite move to get to more offers of other independent consultants. Nobody can seriously say that there is only a firm for this, because other cities have established new already Stadtwerke and discussed here. The well chosen and commissioned law firm has no references at all on this issue. "In the times of the emergency budget with more than 330.000.000 debt into the city's coffers, the first commandment is an economical financial management, and by teaching multiple offers, you would certainly have much save" can. Unfortunately has the Mayor in the forgotten City Council meeting to explain how he the 100,000 500,000 will take, and where he now further wants to cut back financing. In the end is more than just a Gschmackle", any idea how Tax waste, cronyism, corruption, felt and his now actually tastes: expensive! Now I'm curious to see what happens when people talk about things that nobody should actually know? "Wikipedia.de writes: corruption referred to corruption and bribery, acceptance of bribes and favours." Tomas M.