The end of the comment from Nicholas. Why politically reprehensible or deplorable and this phrase or criterion contradicts what exposes in his article. Says Nicolas: Memory betrays us, manipulate information. The struggle for the freedom of the fatherland is increasingly further from here and internal dissent is assumed with more bravery and their own right. Ends cometary why judging the strategy or tactics of opponents who are against the flames, by which we remove them subtly force to the internal opposition despite their weight, says Nicolas Perez in 50 years blocking or however, as they like to call it not been achieved nothing with conspiracies, intransigence, of the most anti-Castro radical fundamentalism, sabotage, the mandarrias breaking discs of the Van Van. That you will, another fifty years, what for? Give him a chance to play every day, who gets respect before the enemy of his own people to respect. There are no arguments to make the slightest criticism to these people, who are still eating what they can and living as best they can. They and their families face every hour and every day, pressures and oppressions which is very hard for a them and more for their families.
You must demonstrate a little d stoicism that we are far from the whip of the huge power of the Castro. One thing could be an argument to criticize those who are in the bowels of the phenomenon, is the freedom of expression but is not justified in this case. To achieve the freedom of expression in Cuba, We sacrifiquemos something of herself in exile, where many things can do to reassure us, that of the island nor imagine that they exist.